Track description
Goals/objectives and Areas
In this track, the objective is to expand our understanding of what makes cities and regions more resilient in the face of escalating global ecological crises and associated changes such as those induced by climate change. The concept of resilience is an interdisciplinary, holistic, and proactive approach to addressing interconnected and complex problems that have a regional perspective, relying on urban-rural cooperation in territorial development. The concept of resilience is closely related to sustainability and integral to the Sustainable Development Goals, but it is not limited only to environmental challenges. It also encompasses social and technological aspects with a future conscious-strategic way of thinking as well as planning. The resilience of the complex socio-ecological-technical systems (SETS) of cities and regions involves various actors, sectors, and systems across spatial and temporal scales. SETS encompass the human-made built environment, including the physical aspects such as buildings, infrastructure, and anthropogenically modified open spaces. The Resilience Alliance defines social-ecological resilience as a system’s ability to withstand change and still maintain the same functions and structures, to self-organize, and to learn and adapt. It is essential to strike a balance between resilience as an attempt to maintain the status quo and transformative resilience, which aims to avoid collapse through change. This regular and rhythmic dance between chaos and order, between stability and transformation is fundamental to complex adaptive systems.
Similarly, urban and regional resilience is not only the ability to survive or recover from crises but also to proactively change unsustainable and unjust systems and behaviours. Human health and wellbeing must be at the heart of any effort to build urban or regional resilience. However, resilience should not only be considered from a human perspective; it should also encompass the impacts on the entire human-shaped environment, including ecosystems. To mitigate negative impacts, it is essential to include circular economy concepts such as closing, slowing and narrowing in resilience thinking. To achieve this, it is necessary to empower key stakeholders in cities and regions to develop a sustainable, adaptable, climate-neutral, and resilient built environment. Building resilience includes adapting to weather extremes such as heavy rainfall, heatwaves, and droughts and their impacts, which comprises not only structural precautionary and adaptation measures but also includes options for behaviour-related measures as well as planning strategies including the identification of potentially necessary changes to the legal framework. This requires methods to integrate risk reduction planning (e.g., through multifunctional, nature-based solutions) and increased awareness of the necessity and effectiveness of self-preparedness by private actors. It necessitates a shared understanding of the necessary changes as well as a better understanding of available courses of action.
It is becoming increasingly clear that urban resilience is not only a concern for cities but also affects entire regions. The sessions in this track aim to bring together the latest insights on what urban and regional resilience means in today’s world in crisis. We also aim to identify various innovations that are enhancing communities’ resilience, including socio-cultural innovations in different urban areas or regions.
Examples of topics that would fit in this track include:
- Strategies, plans, policies, and adaptation measures to enhance urban and regional resilience and cooperation,
- Characteristics and metrics for urban and regional resilience,
- Methodological developments in studying urban and regional resilience,
- Synergies and trade-offs in resilience strategies across different shocks and stresses, systems, or scales,
- Discussing advancements in interdisciplinary approaches to resilience research;
- Changes in people's perceptions and demands as a result of crises and shocks, and how this affects resilience priorities,
- Differing narratives of resilience and how this affects both policy and practice,
- Cases of regional resilience and lessons from applied experiences,
- Critiques of the SDGs concerning urban and regional resilience, and
- Discussing potential improvements or alternative frameworks for achieving resilience in line with sustainable development objectives.
Format and content of expected abstracts:
Proposed abstracts should be between 300 and 500 words (including everything):
- shall be best organized (without headlines) along usual structures (e.g., intro/method/findings or results/ discussion/conclusions)
- does not need to, but can include references
- shall provide in a final section
a. to which SDG(s) and SDG-target(s) their proposed abstract especially relate to (e.g. “SDG+Target: 14.1.”).
b. a brief indication how the proposed contribution relates to the topic of the Conference
Potential Publication Channels
Depending on the number and quality of contributions to the track, the following publication opportunities have already been envisioned:
- Sustainable Development (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10991719;
- Urban Transformations: https://urbantransformations.biomedcentral.com/about
Recommended Sources:
- Look at the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network on Sustainable Cities: Inclusive, Resilient, and Connected
Past Conference
ISDRS 2021
Short report on co-chaired 6b track sessions (with Regine Ortlepp and Janaina Macke, on 14 and 15 July 2021):
Papers presented in these session were quite interdisciplinary, introducing topics from various angles of sustainable cities and communities covering many regions from the Himalaya in India through Western to Central Europe. Researchers were mainly doctoral students – supported by their tutors - , presenting and testing their research work until now, ready for discussive reflections and comments both from the chairs and session participants. From a methodological point of view, some of them were dominantly quantitative research, e.g. a district-level analysis of the Indian Himalayan Region, assessing socio-economic and livelihood vulnerability relevant for climate adaptation or the heatwave vulnerability and sustainability assessment of Hungarian large cities. While others concentrated on the context-dependent nature of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) at the city level to deepen our understanding of the interconnectedness of targets and indicators of SDGs, or introduced us to the special field of Industrial Ecology (IE) with the help of field research in France. Having a future-oriented dimension, a group of researchers presented their research agenda on innovations from urban margins of the Southwestern bow of Stockholm, at the same time highlighting and raising such socio-economic problems and questions, which have been quite rare in the track, although extremely important (social isolation, marginalization, segregation, inequality, trust, belonging, security etc…).
Most related UN-SDGs
Who are we?
Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Dresden
Department of Urban Planning and Design/Department of Sociology and Communication
Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME), Hungary
https://www.urbanisztika.bme.hu/en/orban-annamaria-phd/
Next Conference: Track 6b
Keep up to date with developments of ISDRS 2025 Track 6b here
“Sustainability and Beyond“
31st Annual Conference in Budapest
Find useful essays, free books and articles, case studies and more at our partner's website:
LinkedIn Discussions
Partner Organisations
Possible partners:
- UN Sustainable Development Platform (https://sdgs.un.org/goals)
- UNEP Sustainable cities (https://www.unep.org/regions/asia-and-pacific/regional-initiatives/supporting-resource-efficiency/sustainable-cities)
- European Committee of Regions (https://cor.europa.eu/en)
- European Sustainable Cities Platform (https://sustainablecities.eu/home/)
- Local Governments for Sustainability (https://iclei-europe.org/)